In the article "Surprise Hit Was a Shock for Artists Heard on it" talks about the harlen shake and the to voices used. The two voices that was used are Hector Delgado, and Jayson Musson why was this a shock to them.

           Hector Delgado was a artist five year ago now a preacher in Puerto Rico.Then he was told his voice on the song "Harlen Shake". Jayson Musson a rapper from  Philadelphia was also told his voice can be heard saying "Do the Harlem Shake." Both Mr. Musson and Mr.Delgado are looking for compensation from Mad Decent Record.

          "Harlen Shake"was on the top of the 100 pop chart, sold 816000 digital downloads , and was at the top for three weeks . This  was also a popular thing for college, high schools, and sports teams amd a lot of people watched this and made video. In my Parkway West High School every one wented to make a video it was fun even our teacher was in it .

            I don't think it was right for him to just use their voice and not ask or pay them. I think Hector Delgado and Jayson Musson should get the money the need from this hit song. What made him think that it was right for him not to tell or pay for using their voice in his song . Why not just ,ask or ppay them money for this now they are both looking for compensation which shouldn't happen if he just ask or paid them.
         

          In the article "Slaughter of the African Elephants" by Samantha Strndberg and Flona Maisela is about Elephants being killed so their tusk can be used to sell for different things. One other thing is the way the elephants are being killed.

          In a lot of countries in the far East demands have been rising for ivory trinkets which are made of elephants tusks. This elephants are being killed off to make ivory and will be soon pushed to extinction and they are needed for other things. They make trails that are used by other animals and spread large amount of seeds.

           What they are doing to this elephants should be said some thing about.  They are mistreating these animal and killing them off faster then it should be and they our doing this for money. .Elephant are important to their habitat they help us and other animals to live. All animal play a part in life to other animals and people these Elephants have a life and family to just as we do to. A baby elephants can know his or her dad or mom is gone. They not parents as much as a human needs theirs so why do this is what i ask.

         

          In the article "SISTER IN ARMS" by James Dao is about woman being allowed to be in combat in the military. This article talks mainly about why woman should and should not be allowed in the miliary.

          The miliary are now leting woman go into combat can woman handle this.some countires have already let woman into combat like Israel, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Denmark, and Germany. In Isarael they allowed this in 1973 and in 1995 allowed them to be fighter pilots. Australia woman were allowed to go into combat in 2011. In New Zealand the ban on woman was lifted in .2010. In Canada woman have been allowed since 1989. Since 1988 Denmark have allowed woman in the army. In 2001 Germany has let woman into their combat unit.

          Should woman be able to enter into combat. I think they should be able to go into combat the can do everything a man can. If woman want to go into combat they should be tested on the same thing the man are. When woman are tested their run time is slower and they have to do less pushup. I thinh if they are doing the same thing they should be treated equaly.The only thing they should have to do is make sure the woman are ready for combat they should all be treated the same woman should have to be able to hold their own weight.

        
           In the article "Cyberwar" by Patricia Smith is about a cyberwar between the U.S., China, and Iran.One cyber attack was on Saudi Aramco oil company valued about $7 trillion were the U.S. buys half of its oil for many reason oil is important to the U.S. .

          Many believe that the China's attack towards America was to find secrets of our government nt to do any real harm. The Iran plan was to harm, they are believe to be responsible for the cyberattack on Saudi Aramco oil company, in September they took offline some of America most important banks like Wells Fargo. America cyberattack Iran main nuclear enrichment plants. The plan was to slow down or stop the Iran nuclear weapon.

          Cyberwars is a betterway of fighting then just fight war. One thing that is bad about cyberwar is that they can hack secrets that only the goverment know, also can find weapon we are building and slow down our progress. The good thing is we can do the same and more. A cyberwar can hurt the U.S. a lot to, like it already did hack into our main banks and take money out and send it to their self. But I do think it is a good way to do war cyber

          In the article "ARE YOU BEING TRACKED" talk about cell phone and the software that tracks someone whereabouts by GPS in their cellphone. But is this right for them to put tracker in your cell phones.Is it safe or is it wrong to track people with their phone.

          Tracking phone can be safe. If you need help or you have be kid nap and you have not been seen in day, You can be track and found in a short time and can be saved before you are really harmed or even killed  and the my never be able to find you. One thing that can help keep it privacy right is to have you parent be able to track you at all times

          A young woman was kidnapped at a  Community College in sardinia,Ohio. She was saved by a software in your phone that tracks where you are by GPS. This software could be helpful for alot of things and kidnapping cases that are happening now. A lot of children are being kidnnapped, and so are still missing. This is something that should be us in cases.


          Why is this used for everyday cases? Why is it that they are not used in more kidnapping cases to find kids and to find kidnapping? This GPS can be used for good and bad things they are good for a lot of thing which will you choose


         

          In the article  "Give Lance another chance" talks about Lance Armstong who has over came cancer and breaking cycling records. Armstrong won seven Tour de France titles and now they are finding out that he used performance-enhancing drugs,


          Armstrong was an inspiration to childern, and other people with cancer. Shoould he be forgiven for using performance-enhancing druds and he made kids with cancer feel like they could do andthing even with their illness. Cancer is a hard illness to fight and for him to make this childern feel like they can, he should be rewarded for that.

         
          Armstrong win seven Tour de France titles but cheated in all of them. It was said that Armstrong don't treat his teammates right also that he behaved badly. Many people have heard people saying it but have not believe it and defend him. But now they know that he did and don't want to give him a second chance. Other like people with cancer say he should be  he was an inspiration and important to other cyclers who looked up to him.


          Should Armstrong get another chance i am one of them who don't really know him or what he did. I think it could be anyway people think differently some will give him another chance some will not. Their are many reasons he should and many reasons he souldn't.

blog 9

         Corporal punishment should not be allowed in school. In the article " Twenty good reasons to stop a bad practice" by Jordon Riak talk's about corporal punishment.Also what it can do kids and the teacher that use corporal punishment.

          School who use corporal  punishment is allowed  in 19 states and schools who use corporal punisment have poor academic achievement , more violence and dropouts than school that don't. Teachers who hit kids have great risk of being a criminal. Schools who use corporal punishment spend more time disciplining than teaching.

          Corporal punishment  can cause kids to fear teacher and not learn from. Corporal punishment  can also take time of there learning. Kids can learn violence and become violence and think this is the only way to disciplining. The CMA study corporal punishment over 20 years and concluded that corporal punishment increase level of aggression.Corpral punishment increase level of depression, and drug use to.

          corporal punishment can cause  kids to feel unsafe in school and cause them to drop out and skip school. This can cause them to have different reaction to teachers and other students. Corporal punishment cannot help kids do better in school or stop bad behavior in school. Some say it teaches discipline  and respect.


       Corporal punishment can be child abuse and kids can continue to misbehavior after many spanking. This punishment doesn't stop all kids from doing bad thing. This just is a way to teach violence and a bad way to disciplining kids. Corporal punishment is the wrong way to disciplin kids it can't help kids in school

       Corporal punishment is a bad thing and can cause kids to do worst in school. Which can cause kids grades to drop and to dropout. Which is a reason schools who use corpoeal punishment have more then school who don't.